@conference {saw:2013:ecsa,
	title = {Team Situational Awareness and Architectural Decision Making with the Software Architecture Warehouse},
	booktitle = {7th European Conference on Software Architecture (ECSA 2013)},
	year = {2013},
	month = {July},
	pages = {146-161},
	publisher = {Springer},
	organization = {Springer},
	address = {Montpellier, France},
	abstract = {The core of the design of software architecture is all about architectural decision making. A high-quality design outcome sets high requirements, not only on the skills and knowledge of the design team members, but also on the management of the decision making process. We claim that in order to deliver high quality decisions, the design team needs to obtain a high level of situational awareness. To address this, we present an analysis of the problem of team situational awareness in design workshops and propose a model on how stakeholder positions help to build consensus within the argumentation viewpoint of architectural decisions. We show how the Software Architecture Warehouse tool has been extended to support the argumentation viewpoint within its live design document metaphor to provide support for co-located and distributed design workshops.},
	keywords = {architectural decisions, collaborative design, SAW},
	doi = {10.1007/978-3-642-39031-9_13},
	author = {Marcin Nowak and Cesare Pautasso}
}
@inproceedings {saw:2011:shark,
	title = {Goals, questions and metrics for architectural decision models},
	year = {2011},
	month = {May},
	pages = {21{\textendash}28},
	publisher = {ACM},
	address = {Waikiki, Hawaii, USA},
	abstract = {Architectural decisions are the key element behind the design process leading to a software architecture. Making software architects aware of the implications of their decisions is only the beginning of what can be achieved by capturing the rationale and the constraints influencing the decision making process in a reusable body of architectural knowledge. In this paper we propose a metric-based approach to the analysis of architectural decision models. Using a hierarchically-structured approach we identify a number of useful goals and stakeholders involved in the architectural design process. Next, we sketch a set of metrics to provide data for the evaluation of the aforementioned goals. Our aim is to stimulate a discussion on how to find indicators relevant for software architects by measuring the intrinsic properties of architectural knowledge.},
	keywords = {architectural decision modeling, metrics, SAW, software architecture, visualization},
	isbn = {978-1-4503-0596-9},
	doi = {10.1145/1988676.1988682},
	author = {Marcin Nowak and Cesare Pautasso}
}
@inproceedings {saw:2010:shark,
	title = {Architectural decision modeling with reuse},
	year = {2010},
	month = {May},
	pages = {13 - 20},
	publisher = {ACM},
	address = {Cape Town, South Africa},
	abstract = {Architectural decision modeling aims at supporting the software architecture design process by capturing a reusable body of architectural knowledge. Whereas significant progress has been made towards this vision, there still remains a number of open problems. This paper outlines selected research challenges and opportunities related to knowledge capturing and sharing, model evolution and verification, and the integration of the architectural design process with existing software development methodologies. Our goal is to start a discussion on a roadmap for future research on reusable modeling of architectural decisions.},
	keywords = {architectural decisions, SAW},
	isbn = {9781605589671},
	doi = {10.1145/1833335.1833338},
	author = {Marcin Nowak and Cesare Pautasso and Olaf Zimmermann}
}
